We have talked at length about how the Internet and
digital media have transformed the music industry. The music industry always seems
to be in some state of flux. Maybe a good question to ask is how does an artist
connect with their fans in the digital age? A recent study conducted by MTV Research
attempts to understand this question with regards to younger fans, or so called
Millennials.
The study revealed a number of findings that should
yield some understanding of what younger
audiences demand from artists in 2013. The first finding is “zero-distancing.” The idea here is that fans
need artists to be highly accessible. This is likely due to the fact
that younger fans are persistently online and digitally connected on various
social media platforms. Even the mundane is somewhat noteworthy to this group
of consumers. Millennials want to share in the artist’s lives.
The next finding is “music
is on shuffle,” meaning that Millennials are more likely today to have varied
taste in music. The study offers that this is, again, due the highly connected
digital world that we live in today. In fact, the report states, “a Millennial
list of “fave artists” might be as diverse as One Direction, Etta James, Lil
Wayne and The Supremes.” Prior to Internet, music fans would typically listen
to a specific radio station, which would push various artists. The following is
a look at the Billboard's top artists of 1988:
·
George Michael
·
INXS
·
George Harrison
·
Rick Astley
·
Guns N' Roses
·
Whitney Houston
·
Belinda Carlisle
·
Tiffany
·
Breathe
·
Steve Winwood
There is a notably diverse set of artists in this
list that was being aired on a “top 40 station.” However, these artists are
contemporaries. That is a far cry from the results of this study, where “One
Direction and Etta James” may end up on the same playlist. A Key statistic in
this research is that 85% agree, “among people my [their] age, it’s cooler to
listen to a diverse range of music versus one genre.””
Next on the list of
findings is “there’s no such thing as selling out.” The report suggests that
Millennials do not discriminate against artists who take endorsement
deals. Digital media now represents more
than 50% of music sold. As the graph demonstrates, the decline in physical
revenues has a significant impact on industry revenue. Millennials are
comfortable with bands needing to get money from various sources since little
revenue is actually from selling their music to fans. This is very different
from acts like the Beatles and Led Zeppelin who would have seen selling out as
a very bad thing for their artistic integrity.
The study also finds that
“buying music is symbolic patronage for Millennials.” The frequency of younger
people purchasing music is down greatly due to the peer-to-peer network sharing
sites of the early 2000s. Nearly 70% of Millennials will purchase an artist’s
music, only out of respect for that artist. That same group also believes that
music should be free.
This study offers insight
into an important market share of the music industry, without judging the
Millennials’ thought process.

This is a very informative post. I learned a lot from it. The statistics and research blew me away. I also learned a new word which is Millennials. I think I would be considered one actually because I have a wide array of music I listen to and do not buy any of it but instead use peer-to-peer networking. I love your post and am looking forward to reading more.
ReplyDelete